Statement by Ambassador Mitsuru Kitano, Director-General,
Disarmament, Non-Proliferation and Science
Department,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
Japan
at the Second Session
of the Preparatory Committee
for the 2015 Review
Conference of the Parties to the NPT
Geneva, 22 April 2013
Mr.
Chairman,
Distinguished
delegates,
On
behalf of the Government of Japan, I would like to express my heartfelt
congratulations to you, Ambassador Cornel Feru of
Romania, on your assumption of the chairmanship of the Second Session of the
Preparatory Committee. My delegation assures you of our utmost support for your
efforts.
Mr.
Chairman,
The
year 2015 is fast approaching. Despite progress in certain areas, much of the
Action Plan we all agreed to in 2010 has yet to be implemented. Japan is committed
to contributing to the plan’s fruition.
The
NPT faces new and daunting challenges year after year, making clear the urgency
of our work here. On February 12, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
(DPRK) carried out a nuclear test despite repeated calls from the international
community to refrain from further provocations. This nuclear test is totally
unacceptable as it seriously undermines the peace and security of Northeast
Asia and the international community as a whole. We welcome the UN Security
Council’s adoption on March 7 of Resolution 2094, which strengthened existing
sanctions on the DPRK and added new ones. This resolution must be fully
implemented.
In
order to grapple with these constant challenges, we need to promote all three
pillars of the NPT in a balanced manner. This does not mean that progress in
one pillar should be conditional on progress in on of the others. Rather, steady
advancement should occur in all three.
Mr.
Chairman,
Japan
and the other members of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Initiative
(NPDI), with the strong commitment of our respective Foreign Ministers, are
working to reduce nuclear risk, maintain political momentum, and devise
practical and action-oriented proposals to advance disarmament and
non-proliferation. As the Netherlands delegate stated earlier, at the NPDI
Ministerial Meeting on April 9, our Foreign Ministers endorsed six new working
papers submitted to this session of the Preparatory Committee.
They
also exchanged views on the establishment of a weapons-of-mass-destruction-free
zone in the Middle East, which remains one of our most important objectives. We
fully support the efforts of the facilitator toward the convening of such a
conference and strongly hope that one will be held soon. The concerted efforts
of the conveners and the eagerness of countries of the region will be
indispensable to fulfilling this aim. We urge active and constructive
engagement in this matter on the part of all relevant stakeholders.
Mr.
Chairman,
As
the only country to have suffered atomic bombings during wartime, Japan actively
contributed to the Oslo Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear
Weapons in March. With strengthened resolve to seek a nuclear-weapons-free
world, we continue to advance disarmament and non-proliferation education to inform
the world and the next generation of the dreadful realities of nuclear
devastation.
In
this regard, Japan initiated the “Special Communicators for a World without
Nuclear Weapons” program in 2010. Under the program more than 90 Hibakushas, or atomic bomb survivors, to
date have shared their experiences with international audiences. With atomic
bomb survivors now at an average of more than 78 years old, Foreign Minister
Kishida took the initiative in establishing a “Youth Communicators for a World
without Nuclear Weapons” program. Under this new program, younger generations are
expected to share with the world what they themselves have learned about the
harm inflicted by nuclear weapons and what they have themselves thought about
what they can do to achieve their elimination. We have very high hopes for what
young people can accomplish through this program.
Until
nuclear weapons are abolished, it is a bitter reality that we will have to live
with considerable nuclear risk. Compared to the U.S.-Soviet era of bi-polar
conflict, the risk has undergone transformation and diversified. Given the
awful humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons use, it is an urgent priority as
well as a responsible approach to the present state of affairs to firmly
implement concrete measures contained in the 2010 NPT Action Plan regarding the
CTBT, an FMCT and further reductions of nuclear arsenals in order to
substantially reduce this risk.
Mr.
Chairman,
The
right of all States parties to peaceful use of nuclear energy is recognized
under the NPT, but it is premised on the faithful fulfillment of non-proliferation
obligations as well as the safety of nuclear energy, and the security of
nuclear facilities and materials. From this perspective, it is therefore
important to strengthen and enhance the efficiency of IAEA safeguards, the most
effective tool we have for nuclear non-proliferation. Accordingly, comprehensive
IAEA safeguards reinforced by an additional protocol should be the safeguards
standard today.
In
closing Mr. Chairman, it is our strong desire that a solid foundation is
established for the 2015 NPT Review Conference through frank discussions among
the NPT States parties in the current Preparatory Committee session. Japan, for
its part, commits its full support towards making this a reality.
I
thank you, Mr. Chairman.