Statement by Mr.
Takeshi NAKANE
Deputy Director-General,
Disarmament, Non-Proliferation
and
Science Department,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Representative of Japan to the NPT Review Conference in 2005
At the Plenary Meeting of Main Committee III
May 2005, New York
Madam Chair,
Let me begin by congratulating you on your assumption to the Chair of Main
Committee III. We trust that your experience and skillful guidance will
facilitate constructive discussion and contribute to bringing this Committee to
a fruitful outcome. My delegation will spare no efforts in co-operating with
you in the discharge of your important duties.
(Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy and Japan’s policy)
Madam Chair,
The peaceful uses of nuclear energy is one of the three main pillars of the
NPT, together with the prevention of proliferation of nuclear weapons, and the
pursuit of nuclear disarmament. To slight any one of these three pillars would
seriously jeopardize the credibility of the entire non-proliferation regime. In
this context, the peaceful uses of nuclear energy by a non-nuclear-weapon State
should not be unduly affected as long as it carries out its nuclear activities
with the confidence of the international community by faithfully fulfilling its
NPT obligations and by ensuring high transparency.
Recognizing the invaluable benefits of nuclear energy and the scarcity of
nuclear resources, the Japanese Government has established a policy of nuclear
fuel cycle, whereby plutonium and other materials recovered by reprocessing
spent fuel are reused to secure a steady long-term source of energy. Japan
believes that recycling limited nuclear resources will contribute to securing a
stable supply of nuclear energy, while Japan reassures that the amount of
plutonium Japan possesses does not and will not exceed the necessary level for
a rational and logical plan for its peaceful uses. This has been stipulated in
Japan’s nuclear energy policy document called the “Long-Term Program for
Research, Development and Utilization of Nuclear Energy".
(Nuclear Safety and Security)
Madam Chair,
The peaceful uses of nuclear energy includes not only electric power generation
but also the application of nuclear technology in such fields as human health,
agriculture, industry and so on. It has become indispensable in our daily life.
In order to ensure benefits brought by the peaceful uses of nuclear energy for
present and future generations, the need for nuclear safety cannot be
over-emphasized. One effective means to further enhance the level of safety
among member states is the peer review mechanism pursuant to the Convention on
Nuclear Safety. Recognizing its value, Japan has been participating actively in
this process with other like-minded contracting parties.
It is equally important for the sustenance of nuclear activities for peaceful
uses to take protective measures against nuclear terrorism, particularly after
the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. In this connection, we welcome the
recent adoption by consensus of the International Convention for the
Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism at the United Nations General
Assembly. We also welcome an enhanced momentum to amend the Convention on the
Physical Protection of Nuclear Material to expand its scope from international
transport to inland transport, usage, storage, and nuclear facilities
themselves.
Japan calls upon all States Parties to this Convention to participate in the
IAEA Conference of Plenipotentiaries scheduled to take place this July with a
view to successfully concluding the negotiations. My Government also
appreciates the efforts made by the IAEA in formulating the Code of Conduct on
the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources as well as the Guidance on the
Import and Export of Radioactive Sources with a view to tightening control over
radioactive sources and avoiding their diversion to "dirty bomb".
(Transport of Radioactive Materials)
Madam Chair,
Considering the uneven geographical distribution of resources in the world and
specific technology possessed by a limited number of countries, transport of
radioactive materials is an essential element to reap the benefits from
peaceful uses of nuclear energy. In this connection, ensuring the safe and
smooth transport of radioactive materials is important for all countries that
support the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.
The maritime transport of radioactive materials to and from Japan is carried
out in accordance with the principles of international law, including maritime
navigational rights and freedoms as provided for in international law. It has
been conducted in a thoroughly safe manner over the past thirty years, in
strict conformity with international standards, such as the IAEA’s regulations
for the safe transport of radioactive material and those of IMO. In this
connection, Japan has requested that the IAEA organize a Transport Safety
Appraisal Service (TranSAS) mission this fiscal year, with a view to conducting
an objective assessment on Japan’s national regulations of transport safety.
Japan also attaches great importance to transparency and has, to the extent
possible, provided information, regarding its maritime transport, on a
voluntary basis, to relevant coastal states, fully taking into account, among
other things, the requirements of physical protection. Japan has been making
and will make every effort for enhancing understanding of coastal states on
maritime transport. Japan hopes that an informal discussion on communication
between shipping States and relevant coastal States will serve to that end.
(Multilateral Approaches to Nuclear Fuel Cycle: MNA )
Madam Chair,
Japan shares the view that the international nuclear non-proliferation regime
needs to be urgently strengthened in order to maintain and improve the peace
and stability of the international community. A strengthened regime is also
vital for improving the security environment of Japan, which is directly faced
with the threats posed by the nuclear programs of the DPRK. With regard to
Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle (MNA), Japan appreciates the
intensive efforts made by the International Expert Group to produce a report on
this issue.
The report on the MNA, in order to maintain this momentum, suggests five
possible approaches and recommends that attention be given to them by the IAEA
Member States, by the IAEA itself, by the nuclear industry and by other nuclear
organizations. Japan strongly believes that if further consideration is to be
given by the international community to this issue, the following points, which
were not sufficiently discussed by the International Expert Group, partly due
to its limited mandate, should be fully discussed.
First, careful examination is necessary on how the MNA can contribute to
strengthening the international nuclear non-proliferation regime. In
particular, it is necessary for us to examine very thoroughly whether and how
the MNA will actually contribute to solving the issues of countries that have
already violated their international obligations on non-proliferation, or of
countries of proliferation concern.
Second, it is also important to examine whether the MNA will not unduly affect
the peaceful uses of nuclear energy by a non-nuclear-weapon State that carries
out nuclear activities with the confidence of the international community by
faithfully fulfilling its NPT obligations and by ensuring high transparency of
its nuclear activities. The MNA should not affect the peaceful uses of nuclear
energy by such a non-nuclear-weapon State, particularly when the State has
ratified and is fully implementing both its comprehensive safeguards agreement
and additional protocol, and, as a result, has been accorded a conclusion from
the IAEA Secretariat that there has been no indication of diversion of declared
nuclear material placed under safeguards or of undeclared nuclear material and
activities for the State as a whole.
Finally, more study needs to be done on how the MNA can actually guarantee
supply of nuclear fuel and services, given the fact that the supply of nuclear
fuel and services can be easily affected by the international political
situation and is therefore unpredictable by nature. Of particular importance is
the issue of how the IAEA could be an effective guarantor of nuclear fuel and
services under such circumstances.
Japan strongly believes that if the international community agrees to continue
the discussion on the MNA, the above-mentioned points should be addressed and
thoroughly examined.
In this connection, with regard to a voluntary time-limited moratorium on new
fuel cycle facilities that Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, Director-General of the IAEA,
referred to in his statement at the opening session of the Conference, Japan is
of the view that it is not an appropriate approach. While it is unrealistic to
ensure the participation of all the states including states with proliferation
concern in a moratorium and therefore it would not work in a way that
contributes to strengthening the international non-proliferation regime, it is
more likely to hamper the nuclear activities for peaceful uses based on a
long-term program.
(Technical Cooperation)
Madam Chair,
The promotion of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy through technical
cooperation is an important responsibility of the States Parties to the NPT. We
recognize the important role played by technical cooperation activities through
the IAEA’s Technical Cooperation Program. The IAEA activities, not only in the
field of nuclear power, but also in broader fields such as water, health,
agriculture and industrial applications, will contribute to sustainable
development. From this viewpoint, Japan will continue to take an active part in
the international cooperation in the peaceful use of nuclear energy through
various schemes, including the Regional Cooperative Agreement for Asia and the
Pacific (RCA) as well as the Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia (FNCA).
Madam Chair,
Attaching great importance to the technical cooperation program, Japan has
consistently fully paid its share of the IAEA Technical Cooperation Fund and
achieved a 100% "Rate of Attainment" since its foundation in 1959.
Japan’s contribution to the fund, in effect, represents more than one fifth of
the total Technical Cooperation Fund. We believe that all Member States should
make every effort to contribute their full TCF target shares, on the basis of
shared responsibility. We also encourage the IAEA to manage and implement the
Technical Cooperation program with utmost efficiency and effectiveness in
meeting the expectations of Member States.
(Concluding Remarks)
Madam Chair,
Japan has benefited from a wide range of peaceful uses of nuclear energy under
the most strict IAEA safeguards. I should like to reiterate that the peaceful
uses of nuclear energy must be carried out with the confidence of the
international community by faithfully fulfilling NPT obligations with a high
level of transparency and international confidence. Japan will continue to
support the activities of the IAEA based on these considerations.
Thank you, Madam Chair.