Meeting of the
States Parties to
the
Convention on the Prohibition of
the
Development, Production and Stockpiling of
Bacteriological
(Biological) and Toxin Weapons
and on
Their Destruction
Introduction
At the outset, I would like to extend to you, Mr. Goosen, my warm congratulations on your assumption of the
Chairmanship of this Meeting of the States Parties to the BWC. I assure you of
my delegation’s unwavering support as you guide us to a fruitful conclusion. I
would also like to thank the Secretariat and all those who have put great time
and effort into preparing this Meeting.
Universality
The Government of Japan places high importance on the universalisation and promotion of national implementation
of treaties which counter the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD),
including the BWC. From this viewpoint,
Importance of the BWC
There is a pressing need for the international community to address the
issue of non-proliferation of WMD in order to ensure peace and security for
all. In light of the growing threat of bio-terrorism, not to mention the
devastating effects of WMD, the further strengthening of the BWC, as the only
international framework to comprehensively ban biological weapons, has never
been so important.
Three-Year Programme of Work
The Experts Group Meeting in July this year brought together experts
from various countries and regions around the world to address the topics of
“disease surveillance” and “preparedness and response,” and the Meeting proved
to be an enriching and constructive forum for technical discussion and informal
exchange. The huge amount of material provided during the Meeting showed that
various measures are being taken on a national, regional and international
level, and several common themes emerged which States Parties must address,
despite differences in national legislation systems.
The Sixth Review Conference
The outcome of this Meeting will constitute an important input for
the Sixth Review Conference, to be convened in 2006 to “consider the work of
these meetings and decide on any further action,” according to its mandate. We will need to consider how to carry the
new BWC process forward, including the issue of verification, as we prepare for
the 2006 Review Conference.
Conclusion
Thank you.